Eco Rama » Development http://eco-rama.net Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:41:04 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 Brazilian and Indian Doha Round Solidarity: Is it a reason for blame or a call for leadership? http://eco-rama.net/brazilian-and-indian-doha-round-solidarity-is-it-a-reason-for-blame-or-a-call-for-leadership-2/ http://eco-rama.net/brazilian-and-indian-doha-round-solidarity-is-it-a-reason-for-blame-or-a-call-for-leadership-2/#comments Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:16:45 +0000 Rallapalli White House SpokesmanA blame game seemed to start as soon as Brazils Foreign Minister Celso Amorim and Indian Commerce Minister Kamal Nath walked out of the G4 talks with their counterparts from the US and the EU Thursday in Postdam, Germany. The meeting between these four key players in the World Trade Organization was formulated as an [...]]]> A blame game seemed to start as soon as Brazils Foreign Minister Celso Amorim and Indian Commerce Minister Kamal Nath walked out of the G4 talks with their counterparts from the US and the EU Thursday in Postdam, Germany. The meeting between these four key players in the World Trade Organization was formulated as an attempt to salvage global trade talks from a six year stalemate on the issues of farm subsidies and open markets. It turned into a fiasco and now charges over who or what caused the failure has become an open dispute, which is evoking interesting reactions from the media. Brazilian bloggers are trying to understand whats going on and they too are offering explanations.

White House Spokesman

White House Spokesman
White House Spokesman

In Washington on Thursday (21 June), the White House spokesman declared that President Bush was disappointed with the collapse of the talks in Postdam. The US President blamed Brazil and India for the meetings failure. The president is disappointed with some countries that are blocking an opportunity to expand global commerce, remarked the White House spokesman, Tony Fratto. Big economies as Brazil and India should not stand in the way of the progress of small nations, the poor developing countries but that seems to be what happened in Germany this week, Fratto said.
Lula culpa ricos por fracasso em Doha; Bush critica o Brasil Mercosul e CPLP

No, Mr. Bush. That was not exactly what happened in the city of Postdam, in Germany, where the G4 met. In fact, the powerful nations seem to be opposed to the growth of the less affluent countries, but this kind of relationship is not what happens between Brazil, India and the poorer countries. This pattern exists between the US, the EU and the poorer countries. The core issue seems clear to me the rich countries refuse to cut the agriculture subsidies to their farmers, and this situation cant be seen as fair commerce. End. Brazil and India properly left the talks. The Europeans said that the emerging countries were not ready to make concessions, and I should ask: what more do they want? Meantime leaders are still thinking that social policies are to be restricted to national borders, we wont have any development in the better world project. The attitude of the Lula Government in the case of the Bolivian refineries was, in my view, iconic. It would be indecent if the Brazilian president cared only for the national interests [of Brazil]. The well being of a Bolivian citizen is worth the same as mine or yours, dear reader. But this is not the line of thought of Europeans and Anglo-Americans. That is the reason why the Doha Round is dwindling. Just like Mercosur, Alca, etc.s favas com o comrcio justo Expresso Literria

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

]]> http://eco-rama.net/brazilian-and-indian-doha-round-solidarity-is-it-a-reason-for-blame-or-a-call-for-leadership-2/feed/ 0